Which of the following is an unfair or deceptive practice under California law?
Select an option to reveal the answer and the full 3-part explanation — free, no signup.
Answer & full 3-part explanation (select an option above, or peek)
Why A is correct
California's unfair and deceptive practices law prohibits misrepresenting the terms, benefits, or advantages of an insurance policy. Deception of this kind misleads consumers about what they are actually buying and is a core unfair practice subject to regulatory action, including fines and license discipline. The prohibition is designed to ensure that consumers receive accurate information about coverage before they commit to a policy. By contrast, honest professional conduct, explaining policy exclusions, comparing policies at the client's request, and quoting premiums before the sale, is not only lawful but is a duty of the producer. The line between legitimate disclosure and prohibited misrepresentation is drawn by whether the statement is accurate.
Why the other options are wrong
- B) Explaining policy exclusions to an applicant before the sale is a required disclosure duty that helps the consumer make an informed decision. It is not deception; the problem arises only when the terms, benefits, or advantages of the policy are misrepresented.
- C) Providing a policy comparison at the client's request is a legitimate professional service. As long as the comparison is accurate, it informs rather than misleads, and it is not an unfair practice.
- D) Quoting the premium amount before the sale is completed is ordinary, transparent sales conduct. Disclosing the price does not misrepresent the policy and is not an unfair or deceptive practice.
Memory hook
Misrepresenting the policy is the unfair practice; honest disclosure is a duty.