State RegulationsCO specificDifficulty 2/5
At a Colorado industry meeting, a producer announces that a competing insurer is near collapse, knowing the statement is false and intending to draw away the competitor's agents. This is:
Select an option to reveal the answer and the full 3-part explanation — free, no signup.
Answer & full 3-part explanation (select an option above, or peek)
Why C is correct
C.R.S. § 10-3-1104(1)(c) prohibits making or disseminating false or maliciously critical and derogatory statements about the financial condition of any person that are calculated to injure. A knowingly false insolvency claim aimed at damaging a competitor fits that definition, and it is also actionable under the separate defamation statute, C.R.S. § 10-1-116, when one insurer defames another.
Why the other options are wrong
- A) Coercion involves boycotts, intimidation, or pressure on a party; the producer merely spread a false statement.
- B) Twisting requires misrepresenting a policy's terms to induce a lapse or exchange, which did not occur here.
- D) Unfair discrimination concerns unequal treatment of applicants and policy classifications, not statements about a competitor.
Memory hook
False solvency rumors aimed at a rival equal defamation.